In Cameroon, public health programs face various challenges in effectively translating research into practice, especially in resource-limited settings where funding, infrastructure, and access to care are often constrained. Implementation science provides a structured approach to addressing these challenges by bridging the gap between evidence and real-world application.  You have probably been hearing a lot about ‘Implementation Science (IS)’ and left wandering what exactly it is all about; worry no more because this blog right here will leave you with the answers to the questions and introduce you to the basic concepts about implementation science, all you need to do is read to the end.

Understanding Implementation Science

Implementation science is defined as the study of methods to promote the adoption and integration of evidence-based practices, interventions, and policies into routine health care and public health settings to improve the impact on population health. Implementation science was borne out of a desire to address challenges associated with the use of research to achieve more evidence-based practice (EBP) in health care and other areas of professional practice. IS is dedicated to closing the gap between research findings and everyday practice, especially within public health. It examines how to apply proven interventions in real-world settings, focusing on understanding the factors that affect successful adoption, implementation, and sustainability of health programs. This field of study empowers health professionals to adapt and apply research-backed interventions to meet the unique needs of our communities, ensuring that impactful solutions reach those who need them most crucial for optimizing limited resources, strengthening healthcare systems, and improving health outcomes. 

As we continue to face global health challenges, from emerging infectious diseases to the growing burden of non-communicable diseases, the importance of implementation science cannot be overstated. And we cannot talk about implementation science without discussing the different research domains. Such as Implementation Research, Operational Research and Health System Research. The diagram below briefly summarises and explains these domains.

Figure 1: Different Research Domains

What is the role of Implementation Science in Public Health

• Healthcare settings often are plagued with lots of challenges including but not limited to: infrastructural challenges, limited resources, and unique cultural barriers that make implementing research-based interventions difficult. IS helps tackle limited resources, infrastructural gaps, and other barriers to implementing research-based interventions.
• Imagine you’re standing on one side of a wide river. On your   side is a wealth of public health research; studies, data, and evidence-based strategies. On the other side is the real world, where people live, work, and face everyday health challenges. Often, the bridge connecting these two sides is unstable, incomplete, or entirely missing. This is where IS comes in, the sturdy bridge that connects the vast knowledge we have in public health to the everyday realities people face. Without it, even the best research can fall short, leaving gaps in care, prevention, and health promotion. IS is important in closing the existing ‘KNOW-DO’ gap which takes an average of 17 years for only 14% of findings to be implemented.

• It ensures innovative solutions to integrate research into standard practice, crucial in resource-constrained countries like Cameroon.
• It is essential for overcoming barriers as it studies what works, for whom, and under what conditions, making interventions adaptable to local needs. Another practical example: is the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) to prevent malaria. Scientific research has shown that the use of ITN (sleeping under an ITN, because many people ‘use’ ITNs for purposes they weren’t ideally invented for) can reduce malaria transmission by about 50%. However, despite this knowledge, many communities at high risk for malaria do not consistently use these nets. The question remains why? IS comes in, it explores questions like:
  • What are the barriers to ITN use? Are they cultural? Logistical? Economic?
  • How can these barriers be overcome? Would community education help? What about subsidizing the cost of nets?
  • How can we ensure long-term, sustainable use of ITNs?

By answering these questions, IS helps bridge the gap between knowing what works and actually making it work in the field.

Key Components of Implementation Science

In the context of implementation science, the key components can be succinctly categorized into “the how,” “the what,” and “the where.” These components focus on different aspects of implementing evidence-based interventions effectively:

The What: This component involves the intervention itself the specific practice, program, or policy being implemented. It focuses on the content and nature of the intervention, including: the objectives and goals of the intervention, the components and procedures involved and the expected outcomes and benefits.

The How: This component refers to the implementation strategies and processes used to integrate the intervention into practice. It encompasses the methods and techniques employed to facilitate the intervention’s uptake, adoption, and sustained use. Examples include: training and education for healthcare providers, development of guidelines or protocols and stakeholder engagement and communication strategies.

The Where: This refers to the context or setting in which the intervention is being implemented. It includes the environment, organizational, and systemic factors that can influence the implementation process. Such as the healthcare or public health setting (e.g., hospitals, clinics, community centres etc) which is referred to as an enabling environment.  Let’s dive straight into looking at these key components:

Evidence Based Interventions (EBIs)

Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are the subject of implementation science, such as: programs, practices, principles, procedures, products, pills, or policies (7Ps) that have been demonstrated to improve health behaviours, health outcomes, or health-related environments. Evidence-based interventions are what is being implemented.

For example:

• Programs that provide HIV testing and counselling services in community settings to improve access and early diagnosis and testing.
• Use of ITNs for prevention malaria by pregnant women
• Providing free breast and cervical cancer screening for early detection and prevention of cervical cancer.

Implementation Strategies:

Now we know about EBIs but these EBIs need to be put to work/ practice, this can be done through best practices known as implementation strategies. These are the actions taken to enhance adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based interventions. Implementation strategies are how we seek to get evidence-based interventions into normal practice in clinical or community settings. This involves creating tailored approaches to overcome barriers and leverage facilitators for getting best results. 

There exist a list of 73 implementation strategies compiled by the ERIC project (found here) which provides detailed definitions and guidance on various methods to improve the adoption and effectiveness of evidence-based interventions. Some practical implementation strategies include:

• The training and education of CHWs for community dispensation of ART which is carried out in our context.
• The development of guidelines or protocols to improve ART adherence and health outcomes of people with HIV.
• The integration of HIV care into other health programs.

It is important to know what implementation strategies best works to suit the EBI being implemented. The diagram below serves as a guide for choosing the best fit HOW for the WHAT.

Implementation Outcomes

To assess the effectiveness of the implementation strategy there are what we call implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes are key variables in assessing how well an intervention, policy, or program is integrated into real-world practice. These outcomes help to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies used to implement health interventions and are crucial in understanding the success of public health programs. The core implementation outcomes, as identified by Proctor et al. (2011), include acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability. The table below provides vivid explanation of implementation outcomes and its applicability.

Table 1: Some Implementation Outcomes with real world examples

Enabling Environments:

These are the supportive infrastructures, policies, and resources that facilitate implementation. An enabling environment could include funding from the government or partnerships with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that provide resources.

Stakeholders:

 In Cameroon, stakeholders in HIV and malaria programs range from patients and caregivers to healthcare providers, policymakers, and international partners. Their roles and level of engagement significantly impact implementation success.

Implementation Context:

This refers to physical, economic, political, and cultural environment in which the intervention is deployed. It could be in the community, at the health facility or school. What works in one context may not be effective in another due to variations in resources, culture, or infrastructure. The diagram below provides a detailed picture of how the different concepts of implementation science are applied.

Conclusion

Implementation science serves as a crucial bridge between research and practice, particularly in the context of resource-limited settings like Cameroon. By systematically exploring methods to integrate evidence-based interventions into real-world healthcare settings, it plays an instrumental role in strengthening health systems and improving health outcomes. With a focus on understanding local needs, overcoming barriers, and adapting to specific cultural and logistical challenges, implementation science offers a strategic approach for maximizing the impact of public health programs, especially those addressing high-priority areas like HIV.

References

1. Eccles, M.P., Mittman, B.S. Welcome to Implementation Science . Implementation Sci 1, 1 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
2. About Implementation Science (IS). National Cancer Institute: Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences. https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/IS/about.html. March 8, 2018.
3. Cabinet Implementation Unity Toolkit: Engaging Stakeholders. Australian Government. https://www.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/pmc/implementation-toolkit-3-engagingstakeholders.pdf. June 2013.
4. Brownson RC, Kreuter MW, Arrington BA, True WR. Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward? Public Health Rep. 2006 Jan-Feb;121(1):97-103. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100118. PMID: 16416704; PMCID: PMC1497798.
5. Yapa, H.M., Bärnighausen, T. Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities. Implementation Sci 13, 154 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0847-1
6. World Health Organization. WHO Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV September 2015 [27th Dec, 2019]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186275/9789241509565_eng.pdf;jsessionid=D95F5690AC992DCB82B673779D9EF5D9?sequence=1
7. Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R. et al. Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 38, 65–76 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
8. Proctor, E.K., Bunger, A.C., Lengnick-Hall, R. et al. Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implementation Sci 18, 31 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z
9. Powell, B.J., Waltz, T.J., Chinman, M.J. et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Sci 10, 21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1
10. Rogers Ajeh, Halle Ekane, Egbe O. Thomas, Anastase Dzudie, and Assob N. Jules, “Perceived Patients’ Satisfaction, Barriers and Implications on Engagement in Antiretroviral Treatment Services in Cameroon within the HIV Test and Treat Context.” American Journal of Public Health Research, vol. 7, no. 2 (2019): 73-80. doi: 10.12691/ajphr-7-2-5.
11. Cameroon AIDS Month for campaigns [2024]; https://cnls.cm/site/en/mois-camerounais-mc#:~:text=Cameroon%20AIDS%20Month%20is%20the,AIDS%20Control%20Committee%20(NACC).
12. Ndenkeh JJN, Bowring AL, Njindam IM, Folem RD, Fako GCH, Ngueguim FG, Gayou OL, Lepawa K, Minka CM, Batoum CM, Georges S, Temgoua E, Nzima V, Kob DA, Akiy ZZ, Philbrick W, Levitt D, Curry D, Baral S. HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Continuation Among Key Populations in Cameroon: Lessons Learned From the CHAMP Program. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Sep 1;91(1):39-46. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003012. Epub 2022 May 10. PMID: 35536113; PMCID: PMC9377496.
13. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and Metabiota Cameroon. Feasibility and acceptability of HIV self-testing among female sex workers and men who have sex with men in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Washington, DC: LINKAGES; 2018.
14. Decentralized Drug Distribution in Cameroon: Final Report. https://www.fhi360.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/epic-ddd-cameroon-english.pdf
15. Nilsen, P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Sci 10, 53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
16. Ogundahunsi O, Kamau EM (eds). Implementation research toolkit, second edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.